Lava Flow Development: The Anti-Pattern That Hardens Your Code

Software engineers often speak in strange metaphors, but they're usually rooted in hard-learned lessons. The "lava flow" anti-pattern is one that rings true for many of us who have inherited long-lived software projects.

Imagine a software system in its infancy. It might be a bit rough around the edges – perhaps the code is a bit messy, some features are incomplete, and documentation is sparse. This is natural in the early stages of development.

The trap of "lava flow" development arises when, instead of iterating on this imperfect yet functional system, developers find it easier to build a whole new layer on top of the existing one. Reasons for this might include immediate deadlines, a lack of understanding of the older code, or a reluctance to touch someone else's work. Much like molten lava, this new layer covers the old one, solving the immediate problem. However, over time, this leads to a system with geological-like strata of code from different eras, each with its own quirks, assumptions, and potential conflicts.

The "lava flow" approach leads to a progressively less maintainable system. Changes in one layer can have unintended consequences in others, making bug fixing a nightmare. Unnecessary layers add performance overhead. Over time, the reasoning behind older layers is forgotten, and new developers become terrified of changing anything for fear of breaking the system. Working on a "lava flow" system is demoralizing and stifles innovation.

If you find yourself in a "lava flow" project, there are ways to address it. Before changing anything, meticulously document dependencies and the intent behind each layer. Treat it like an archaeological project! Crucially, make sure to include refactoring time as a non-negotiable part of any new feature development, as this enforces a healthy balance between moving forward and improving the foundation. Consider using the Strangler Pattern to gradually replace old layers with new, improved ones while maintaining compatibility. Most importantly, emphasize collective code ownership and a continuous improvement mindset within your team.

The best cure for "lava flow" development is prevention. Code reviews help ensure a shared understanding of the whole codebase. Test-driven development provides the confidence to refactor safely, and thorough knowledge sharing through documentation makes the team stronger.

While always building the shiny and new is tempting, sometimes the most valuable engineering is improving what already exists. Resisting the seductive pull of "lava flow" development leads to healthier, more sustainable software systems that truly support your goals in the long run.

Share this post on Twitter